If both David Foster Wallace and Tori Wallace were
to come together for a dinner, the topic of discussion would be the fact of how
the people view the world and the way they actually should view it are
different. David Wallace would explain to Tori Morrison how he liked her use of
the children in the story to explain the fact to the women that she cannot tell
them what everything means-- in order to understand they have to gain their own
knowledge through experience. Morrison would commend Wallace on the fact that
he realized that “the real value of real education has almost nothing to do
with knowledge and everything to do with awareness”. Wallace would then explain
that he knows that we must constantly remain cognitive and try to be less
self-centered in the way we think. He would go on to further say that he believed
the way the women thought that certain parts of life already have a predefined
meaning is wrong because he believed that we as humans get to consciously
decide what has meaning and what doesn't. Morrison would comment on how some
things do, already, have a predefined meaning, but just because they do does
not mean they are less important. They are not just there for the sake of being
because they already have meaning. They would conclude the discussion by
saying that we as humans must be like the fish, in Wallace’s story, who remind
themselves constantly that they are in water so they do not get caught up in an
archetypical lifestyle to make their life more abstract. That in doing so we
would actually see the world as it should be viewed.
No comments:
Post a Comment